Sign up for free insights newsletter

601598 vs INPST: Sinotrans Ltd Class A vs Inpost SA

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

60
CN¥6.06
-0.33%
China
$43.47B
IN
INPSTEuronext Amsterdam
€15.22
+0.13%
Netherlands
$7.59B

Quick Summary

Sinotrans Ltd Class A is 5.7× the market cap of Inpost SA. 601598 trades at a lower P/E than INPST. 601598 pays a dividend; INPST does not.

Price & Performance

Metric601598INPST
Current PriceCN¥6.06€15.22
Daily Change-0.33%0.13%
1-Year Return24.69%8.79%
52-Week HighCN¥7.80€16.03
52-Week LowCN¥4.69€9.34
50-Day MACN¥5.96€14.95
200-Day MACN¥6.03€12.38
Beta1.201.15

Size & Revenue

Metric601598INPST
Market Cap$43.47B$7.59B
Enterprise Value$41.28B$9.73B
Revenue (TTM)$96.81B$13.59B
Shares Outstanding5.16B499.60M
Float2.76B226.12M
Employees31,95312,055

Valuation

Metric601598INPST
Trailing P/E11.2258.42
Forward P/E0.000.00
Price / Sales0.452.19
Price / Book1.1010.15
EV / EBITDA7.5211.43

Profitability

Metric601598INPST
Profit Margin4.15%3.75%
Operating Margin (TTM)-0.73%0.00%
Return on Equity9.95%18.68%
Return on Assets1.56%6.75%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.540.26

Growth

Metric601598INPST
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.20%48.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)29.80%-33.30%

Dividends

Metric601598INPST
Dividend Yield4.93%
Dividend / Share0.30

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601598INPST
Sortino (Composite)0.714.29
Sharpe (Composite)0.391.94
Calmar (Composite)-0.056.14
Hurst Exponent0.52670.6381
Piotroski F-Score5/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#9,411#5,272

Ownership

Metric601598INPST
% Insiders8071.90%4138.20%
% Institutions658.30%4135.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.