Home 601326 vs 601919 601326 vs 601919: Qinhuangdao Port Co Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 11.4× the market cap of Qinhuangdao Port Co Ltd. 601919 trades at a lower P/E than 601326. 601919 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601326 601919 Current Price CN¥3.55 CN¥14.72 Daily Change -0.56% -1.34% 1-Year Return 11.64% 3.52% 52-Week High CN¥3.95 CN¥16.97 52-Week Low CN¥3.17 CN¥14.15 50-Day MA CN¥3.58 CN¥15.17 200-Day MA CN¥3.52 CN¥15.09 Beta 0.50 0.74
Size & Revenue Metric 601326 601919 Market Cap $19.72B $225.40B Enterprise Value $19.68B $148.41B Revenue (TTM) $6.99B $219.50B Shares Outstanding 4.76B 12.56B Float 1.07B 7.15B Employees 8,348 32,768
Valuation Metric 601326 601919 Trailing P/E 12.17 7.43 Forward P/E 0.00 8.52 PEG Ratio — 0.26 Price / Sales 2.82 1.03 Price / Book 0.98 0.98 EV / EBITDA 9.33 3.30
Profitability Metric 601326 601919 Profit Margin 22.99% 14.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 12.34% 7.82% Return on Equity 7.96% 12.39% Return on Assets 3.65% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.29 1.98
Growth Metric 601326 601919 Revenue Growth (YoY) -1.20% -12.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -5.30% -64.60%
Dividends Metric 601326 601919 Dividend Yield 3.22% 6.70% Dividend / Share 0.12 1.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601326 601919 Sortino (Composite) -0.02 -0.63 Sharpe (Composite) -0.13 -0.69 Calmar (Composite) -1.72 -2.79 Hurst Exponent 0.4469 0.6273 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #14,036 #8,781
Ownership Metric 601326 601919 % Insiders 8449.70% 6106.30% % Institutions 95.50% 829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.