600895 vs H78: Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd vs HongkongLand USD
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CN¥37.04
+1.56%
H7
H78•SGX
$8.04
-1.11%
Quick Summary
Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd is 3.1× the market cap of HongkongLand USD. 600895 pays a dividend; H78 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥37.04 | $8.04 |
| Daily Change | 1.56% | -1.11% |
| 1-Year Return | 45.77% | 97.08% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥54.95 | $8.82 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥24.08 | $4.16 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥37.85 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥39.56 | — |
| Beta | 0.89 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56.68B | $18.30B |
| Enterprise Value | $79.93B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.18B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.55B | — |
| Float | 790.75M | — |
| Employees | 190 | 3,063 |
Valuation
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 59.03 | — |
| Forward P/E | 31.75 | — |
| Price / Sales | 13.55 | — |
| Price / Book | 3.53 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 33.98 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 23.58% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 37.90% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.12% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.34% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.62 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 624.10% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -16.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.20 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.55 | 2.88 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.23 | 1.70 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.67 | 3.32 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6856 | 0.5704 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #25,249 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 600895 | H78 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5170.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 343.00% | — |
Compare 600895 to peers
Compare H78 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.