Home 600861 vs MMS 600861 vs MMS: Beijing Urban Rural Commercial Group Co Ltd vs Mcmillan Shakespeare Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
MM
MMS • Australian Securities Exchange
Quick Summary Beijing Urban Rural Commercial Group Co Ltd is 8.7× the market cap of Mcmillan Shakespeare Ltd. 600861 trades at a lower P/E than MMS. MMS offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600861 MMS Current Price CN¥16.32 A$15.73 Daily Change -0.18% 2.08% 1-Year Return -24.20% 8.41% 52-Week High CN¥22.42 A$19.79 52-Week Low CN¥15.82 A$13.70 50-Day MA CN¥17.09 A$15.67 200-Day MA CN¥18.71 A$16.87 Beta 0.48 0.64
Size & Revenue Metric 600861 MMS Market Cap $9.24B $1.07B Enterprise Value $1.27B $1.78B Revenue (TTM) $43.66B $584.05M Shares Outstanding 566.11M 69.64M Float 254.63M 57.50M Employees 3,721 1,311
Valuation Metric 600861 MMS Trailing P/E 8.00 10.63 Forward P/E 19.12 10.22 PEG Ratio — 0.93 Price / Sales 0.21 1.83 Price / Book 1.30 9.42 EV / EBITDA 0.67 6.90
Profitability Metric 600861 MMS Profit Margin 2.65% 17.04% Operating Margin (TTM) 7.51% 31.61% Return on Equity 18.91% 88.07% Return on Assets 3.65% 7.68% Diluted EPS (TTM) 2.04 1.44
Growth Metric 600861 MMS Revenue Growth (YoY) -1.70% 7.40% Earnings Growth (YoY) -6.60% 9.30%
Dividends Metric 600861 MMS Dividend Yield 4.28% 9.12% Dividend / Share 0.70 1.39
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600861 MMS Sortino (Composite) -1.43 2.93 Sharpe (Composite) -0.24 4.86 Calmar (Composite) -0.40 9.42 Hurst Exponent 0.5704 0.6668 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #2,835 #20,819
Ownership Metric 600861 MMS % Insiders 5323.50% 1735.90% % Institutions 1653.80% 3534.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.