300750 vs 600861: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A vs Beijing Urban Rural Commercial Group Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
CN¥444.20
-2.15%
60
CN¥16.32
-0.18%
Quick Summary
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A is 218.2× the market cap of Beijing Urban Rural Commercial Group Co Ltd. 600861 trades at a lower P/E than 300750. 600861 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥444.20 | CN¥16.32 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | -0.18% |
| 1-Year Return | 97.02% | -24.20% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥453.98 | CN¥22.42 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥230.69 | CN¥15.82 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥384.16 | CN¥17.09 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥356.38 | CN¥18.71 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.48 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.02T | $9.24B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.81T | $1.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $468.13B | $43.66B |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.41B | 566.11M |
| Float | 2.44B | 254.63M |
| Employees | 185,839 | 3,721 |
Valuation
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 25.21 | 8.00 |
| Forward P/E | 23.87 | 19.12 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.97 | — |
| Price / Sales | 4.31 | 0.21 |
| Price / Book | 5.80 | 1.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.86 | 0.67 |
Profitability
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 16.87% | 2.65% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.45% | 7.51% |
| Return on Equity | 25.36% | 18.91% |
| Return on Assets | 5.40% | 3.65% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 17.52 | 2.04 |
Growth
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 52.40% | -1.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 44.00% | -6.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.28% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.70 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 7.26 | -1.69 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.27 | -0.39 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 8.85 | -1.33 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6434 | 0.5704 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #11,459 | #2,994 |
Ownership
| Metric | 300750 | 600861 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3820.10% | 5323.50% |
| % Institutions | 2728.20% | 1653.80% |
Compare 300750 to peers
Compare 600861 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.