600515 vs TQ5: Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd vs Frasers Property
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CN¥3.63
+0.00%
TQ
TQ5•SGX
SGD 1.07
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd is 9.3× the market cap of Frasers Property. 600515 pays a dividend; TQ5 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.63 | SGD 1.07 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 0.00% | 43.45% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥5.62 | SGD 1.16 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.30 | SGD 0.75 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.01 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥4.35 | — |
| Beta | 0.31 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $41.47B | $4.44B |
| Enterprise Value | $55.09B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.56B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 11.43B | — |
| Float | 8.86B | — |
| Employees | 10,611 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 121.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.70 | — |
| Price / Sales | 9.10 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.76 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 63.88 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.80% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -5.59% | — |
| Return on Equity | 1.26% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.53% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.03 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -61.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.01 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.95 | 4.99 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.75 | 6.99 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.33 | 0.69 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6810 | 0.5862 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #27,759 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 600515 | TQ5 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4711.60% | — |
| % Institutions | 1269.20% | — |
Compare 600515 to peers
Compare TQ5 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.