Sign up for free insights newsletter

600266 vs LGFRY: Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd vs Longfor Properties Co Ltd ADR

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

LG
LGFRYUnited States
$10.70
+1.42%
United States
$7.99B

Quick Summary

Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd is 1.3× the market cap of Longfor Properties Co Ltd ADR. 600266 trades at a lower P/E than LGFRY. LGFRY offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600266LGFRY
Current PriceCN¥5.11$10.70
Daily Change0.59%1.42%
1-Year Return1.19%-21.93%
52-Week HighCN¥7.15$15.45
52-Week LowCN¥4.26$9.49
50-Day MACN¥5.33$12.38
200-Day MACN¥5.19$12.84
Beta1.152.01

Size & Revenue

Metric600266LGFRY
Market Cap$10.61B$7.99B
Enterprise Value$32.20B$28.49B
Revenue (TTM)$32.99B$139.37B
Shares Outstanding2.08B687.52M
Float1.13B2.00B
Employees87530,954

Valuation

Metric600266LGFRY
Trailing P/E0.006.96
Forward P/E4.847.00
PEG Ratio2.61
Price / Sales0.320.06
Price / Book0.460.33
EV / EBITDA301.2211.39

Profitability

Metric600266LGFRY
Profit Margin-2.22%5.56%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.38%7.12%
Return on Equity-5.28%3.74%
Return on Assets0.24%0.99%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.451.67

Growth

Metric600266LGFRY
Revenue Growth (YoY)25.00%25.40%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-53.50%-46.90%

Dividends

Metric600266LGFRY
Dividend Yield0.98%2.08%
Dividend / Share0.050.17

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600266LGFRY
Sortino (Composite)0.03-0.91
Sharpe (Composite)-0.025.55
Calmar (Composite)0.65-0.57
Hurst Exponent0.64120.6326
Piotroski F-Score4/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#13,537

Ownership

Metric600266LGFRY
% Insiders4830.90%0.00%
% Institutions915.10%0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.