Sign up for free insights newsletter

600266 vs FRSHY: Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd vs China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd ADR

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

$7.50
+0.00%
United States
$2.03B

Quick Summary

Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd is 5.2× the market cap of China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd ADR. 600266 trades at a lower P/E than FRSHY. 600266 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600266FRSHY
Current PriceCN¥5.11$7.50
Daily Change0.59%0.00%
1-Year Return1.19%80.51%
52-Week HighCN¥7.15$7.50
52-Week LowCN¥4.26$4.16
50-Day MACN¥5.33$7.50
200-Day MACN¥5.19$7.50
Beta1.150.70

Size & Revenue

Metric600266FRSHY
Market Cap$10.61B$2.03B
Enterprise Value$32.20B$15.63B
Revenue (TTM)$32.99B$62.19B
Shares Outstanding2.08B270.25M
Float1.13B6.52B
Employees8758,384

Valuation

Metric600266FRSHY
Trailing P/E0.0020.83
Forward P/E4.844.89
PEG Ratio0.12
Price / Sales0.320.03
Price / Book0.460.27
EV / EBITDA301.2214.39

Profitability

Metric600266FRSHY
Profit Margin-2.22%1.84%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.38%6.66%
Return on Equity-5.28%1.38%
Return on Assets0.24%0.58%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.450.36

Growth

Metric600266FRSHY
Revenue Growth (YoY)25.00%14.30%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-53.50%-22.30%

Dividends

Metric600266FRSHY
Dividend Yield0.98%0.37%
Dividend / Share0.050.03

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600266FRSHY
Sortino (Composite)0.03
Sharpe (Composite)-0.021.02
Calmar (Composite)0.65
Hurst Exponent0.64120.5394
Piotroski F-Score4/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#15,227

Ownership

Metric600266FRSHY
% Insiders4830.90%0.00%
% Institutions915.10%0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.