Home 600266 vs CTPVF 600266 vs CTPVF: Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd vs CTP N.V Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd and CTP N.V are similar in size. 600266 trades at a lower P/E than CTPVF. CTPVF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600266 CTPVF Current Price CN¥5.11 $16.33 Daily Change 0.59% 0.00% 1-Year Return 1.19% 8.91% 52-Week High CN¥7.15 $22.71 52-Week Low CN¥4.26 $14.99 50-Day MA CN¥5.33 $22.44 200-Day MA CN¥5.19 $20.55 Beta 1.15 0.84
Size & Revenue Metric 600266 CTPVF Market Cap $10.61B $10.39B Enterprise Value $32.20B $17.87B Revenue (TTM) $32.99B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 2.08B 479.28M Float 1.13B 130.34M Employees 875 924
Valuation Metric 600266 CTPVF Trailing P/E 0.00 7.37 Forward P/E 4.84 19.46 Price / Sales 0.32 10.68 Price / Book 0.46 1.09 EV / EBITDA 301.22 8.69
Profitability Metric 600266 CTPVF Profit Margin -2.22% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 13.38% 63.98% Return on Equity -5.28% 13.68% Return on Assets 0.24% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.45 2.94
Growth Metric 600266 CTPVF Revenue Growth (YoY) 25.00% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -53.50% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 600266 CTPVF Dividend Yield 0.98% 2.91% Dividend / Share 0.05 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600266 CTPVF Sortino (Composite) -0.34 -0.56 Sharpe (Composite) -0.26 -0.64 Calmar (Composite) -0.61 -1.40 Hurst Exponent 0.6412 0.5379 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #21,621
Ownership Metric 600266 CTPVF % Insiders 4830.90% 7223.80% % Institutions 915.10% 1711.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.