Home 600266 vs CTPNV 600266 vs CTPNV: Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd vs CTP N.V. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of CTP N.V.. 600266 trades at a lower P/E than CTPNV. CTPNV offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600266 CTPNV Current Price CN¥5.11 €16.66 Daily Change 0.59% 2.21% 1-Year Return 1.19% 2.08% 52-Week High CN¥7.15 €19.60 52-Week Low CN¥4.26 €14.14 50-Day MA CN¥5.33 €16.94 200-Day MA CN¥5.19 €17.92 Beta 1.15 0.94
Size & Revenue Metric 600266 CTPNV Market Cap $10.61B $7.79B Enterprise Value $32.20B $16.37B Revenue (TTM) $32.99B $972.50M Shares Outstanding 2.08B 485.04M Float 1.13B 129.31M Employees 875 924
Valuation Metric 600266 CTPNV Trailing P/E 0.00 7.11 Forward P/E 4.84 16.13 PEG Ratio — 2.76 Price / Sales 0.32 8.01 Price / Book 0.46 0.92 EV / EBITDA 301.22 9.83
Profitability Metric 600266 CTPNV Profit Margin -2.22% 111.24% Operating Margin (TTM) 13.38% 63.98% Return on Equity -5.28% 13.68% Return on Assets 0.24% 2.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.45 2.26
Growth Metric 600266 CTPNV Revenue Growth (YoY) 25.00% 5.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -53.50% -38.30%
Dividends Metric 600266 CTPNV Dividend Yield 0.98% 3.99% Dividend / Share 0.05 0.63
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600266 CTPNV Sortino (Composite) -0.34 1.28 Sharpe (Composite) -0.26 3.64 Calmar (Composite) -0.61 3.86 Hurst Exponent 0.6412 0.5953 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank — #21,157
Ownership Metric 600266 CTPNV % Insiders 4830.90% 7330.30% % Institutions 915.10% 1701.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.