Home 600106 vs 601919 600106 vs 601919: Chongqing Road & Bridge Co Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 27.2× the market cap of Chongqing Road & Bridge Co Ltd. 601919 trades at a lower P/E than 600106. 601919 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600106 601919 Current Price CN¥6.23 CN¥14.72 Daily Change 1.63% -1.34% 1-Year Return 21.68% 3.52% 52-Week High CN¥7.81 CN¥16.97 52-Week Low CN¥5.04 CN¥14.15 50-Day MA CN¥5.96 CN¥15.17 200-Day MA CN¥6.37 CN¥15.09 Beta 0.67 0.74
Size & Revenue Metric 600106 601919 Market Cap $8.28B $225.40B Enterprise Value $7.82B $148.41B Revenue (TTM) $112.92M $219.50B Shares Outstanding 1.33B 12.56B Float 930.22M 7.15B Employees 122 32,768
Valuation Metric 600106 601919 Trailing P/E 34.61 7.43 Forward P/E 10.14 8.52 PEG Ratio — 0.26 Price / Sales 73.32 1.03 Price / Book 1.57 0.98 EV / EBITDA 23.44 3.30
Profitability Metric 600106 601919 Profit Margin 203.51% 14.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 65.15% 7.82% Return on Equity 4.57% 12.39% Return on Assets 0.64% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.18 1.98
Growth Metric 600106 601919 Revenue Growth (YoY) 0.30% -12.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 148.30% -64.60%
Dividends Metric 600106 601919 Dividend Yield 0.59% 6.70% Dividend / Share 0.04 1.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600106 601919 Sortino (Composite) 5.11 -0.63 Sharpe (Composite) 1.87 -0.69 Calmar (Composite) 6.79 -2.79 Hurst Exponent 0.6023 0.6273 Piotroski F-Score 3/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #24,306 #8,781
Ownership Metric 600106 601919 % Insiders 1479.80% 6106.30% % Institutions 1672.70% 829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.