Home 600089 vs 601816 600089 vs 601816: Tbea Co Ltd vs Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd is 1.7× the market cap of Tbea Co Ltd. 601816 trades at a lower P/E than 600089. 601816 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600089 601816 Current Price CN¥27.32 CN¥4.93 Daily Change -2.25% 0.00% 1-Year Return 135.92% -17.42% 52-Week High CN¥32.78 CN¥6.02 52-Week Low CN¥11.46 CN¥4.84 50-Day MA CN¥28.77 CN¥5.00 200-Day MA CN¥21.88 CN¥5.17 Beta 0.75 0.22
Size & Revenue Metric 600089 601816 Market Cap $138.19B $240.71B Enterprise Value $165.17B $278.84B Revenue (TTM) $97.23B $42.61B Shares Outstanding 5.05B 48.93B Float 4.10B 14.08B Employees 30,542 86
Valuation Metric 600089 601816 Trailing P/E 23.58 18.22 Forward P/E 9.57 0.00 PEG Ratio 0.71 — Price / Sales 1.42 5.65 Price / Book 1.90 1.18 EV / EBITDA 10.30 14.55
Profitability Metric 600089 601816 Profit Margin 6.12% 30.64% Operating Margin (TTM) 2.32% 48.10% Return on Equity 6.28% 5.80% Return on Assets 2.09% 4.17% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.16 0.27
Growth Metric 600089 601816 Revenue Growth (YoY) -4.70% 2.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) 81.50% 9.40%
Dividends Metric 600089 601816 Dividend Yield 1.29% 3.18% Dividend / Share 0.36 0.16
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600089 601816 Sortino (Composite) 2.65 -1.07 Sharpe (Composite) 1.41 -0.83 Calmar (Composite) 5.03 -1.74 Hurst Exponent 0.6441 0.4423 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 9/9 Magic Formula Rank #17,512 #15,977
Ownership Metric 600089 601816 % Insiders 1818.10% 6497.20% % Institutions 1861.30% 2138.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.