Sign up for free insights newsletter

600018 vs 6198: Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd vs Qingdao Port International Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥4.93
-1.00%
China
$115.00B
61
6198Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$7.67
+0.00%
Hong Kong
$62.12B

Quick Summary

Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd is 1.9× the market cap of Qingdao Port International Co Ltd. 6198 trades at a lower P/E than 600018. 6198 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric6000186198
Current PriceCN¥4.93HK$7.67
Daily Change-1.00%0.00%
1-Year Return-10.69%31.34%
52-Week HighCN¥5.90HK$7.69
52-Week LowCN¥4.93HK$5.57
50-Day MACN¥5.07HK$7.26
200-Day MACN¥5.43HK$7.10
Beta0.120.49

Size & Revenue

Metric6000186198
Market Cap$115.00B$62.12B
Enterprise Value$132.42B$49.69B
Revenue (TTM)$39.61B$18.81B
Shares Outstanding23.28B1.10B
Float2.82B1.37B
Employees13,0169,552

Valuation

Metric6000186198
Trailing P/E8.528.02
Forward P/E11.340.00
Price / Sales2.903.30
Price / Book0.820.93
EV / EBITDA5.535.97

Profitability

Metric6000186198
Profit Margin34.24%28.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.77%24.63%
Return on Equity9.86%11.81%
Return on Assets2.99%5.19%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.580.85

Growth

Metric6000186198
Revenue Growth (YoY)6.30%-7.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-27.10%-15.30%

Dividends

Metric6000186198
Dividend Yield3.92%4.58%
Dividend / Share0.200.34

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric6000186198
Sortino (Composite)-1.903.73
Sharpe (Composite)-1.561.97
Calmar (Composite)-4.5010.61
Hurst Exponent0.57290.5722
Piotroski F-Score4/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#14,684#6,984

Ownership

Metric6000186198
% Insiders8776.40%2669.70%
% Institutions463.80%3693.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.