5938 vs DKILF: LIXIL Corporation vs Daikin IndustriesLtd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
5938•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,615.50
-0.58%
DK
DKILF•United States
$136.53
-5.55%
Quick Summary
LIXIL Corporation is 14.0× the market cap of Daikin IndustriesLtd. DKILF pays a dividend; 5938 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,615.50 | $136.53 |
| Daily Change | -0.58% | -5.55% |
| 1-Year Return | 2.12% | 24.65% |
| 52-Week High | ¥1,943.32 | $144.55 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,568.82 | $107.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $124.64 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $122.62 |
| Beta | — | 0.50 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $512.81B | $36.52B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $34.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $4.83T |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 292.83M |
| Float | — | 292.79M |
| Employees | — | 103,544 |
Valuation
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 21.25 |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.68 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.46 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.01 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.05 |
Profitability
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 5.67% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 5.16% |
| Return on Equity | — | 9.29% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.45% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 5.87 |
Growth
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 7.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -1.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.85% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 310.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.33 | 1.39 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.40 | 0.91 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.14 | 5.48 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6278 | 0.4343 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #5,885 |
Ownership
| Metric | 5938 | DKILF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 457.60% |
| % Institutions | — | 5497.40% |
Compare 5938 to peers
Compare DKILF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.