4901 vs MMM: FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation vs 3M Company
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
4901•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,166.00
-0.53%
MMM•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€131.75
+2.37%
Quick Summary
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation is 55.8× the market cap of 3M Company. MMM pays a dividend; 4901 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,166.00 | €131.75 |
| Daily Change | -0.53% | 2.37% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.61% | 14.01% |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,770.00 | €148.88 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,676.00 | €117.34 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €133.58 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €135.89 |
| Beta | — | 1.16 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.77T | $67.42B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $72.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $24.95B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 522.40M |
| Float | — | 525.83M |
| Employees | — | 60,500 |
Valuation
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 24.96 |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.30 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.45 |
| Price / Sales | — | 2.70 |
| Price / Book | — | 16.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.17 |
Profitability
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 13.03% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 12.41% |
| Return on Equity | — | 75.50% |
| Return on Assets | — | 7.58% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 5.13 |
Growth
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 2.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -19.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.29% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 2.92 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.65 | 2.75 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.57 | 1.33 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.14 | 4.36 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6173 | 0.5288 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #9,116 |
Ownership
| Metric | 4901 | MMM |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 9.80% |
| % Institutions | — | 7679.30% |
Compare 4901 to peers
Compare MMM to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.