Sign up for free insights newsletter

301259 vs 601919: Hunan Airbluer Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd. vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥14.72
-1.34%
China
$225.40B

Quick Summary

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 44.0× the market cap of Hunan Airbluer Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltd.. 601919 pays a dividend; 301259 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric301259601919
Current PriceCN¥38.71CN¥14.72
Daily Change11.59%-1.34%
1-Year Return17.95%3.52%
52-Week HighCN¥57.20CN¥16.97
52-Week LowCN¥30.77CN¥14.15
50-Day MACN¥15.17
200-Day MACN¥15.09
Beta0.320.74

Size & Revenue

Metric301259601919
Market Cap$5.12B$225.40B
Enterprise Value$5.32B$148.41B
Revenue (TTM)$268.75M$219.50B
Shares Outstanding156.00M12.56B
Float79.41M7.15B
Employees32,768

Valuation

Metric301259601919
Trailing P/E7.43
Forward P/E8.52
PEG Ratio0.26
Price / Sales19.051.03
Price / Book6.190.98
EV / EBITDA-508.633.30

Profitability

Metric301259601919
Profit Margin-1.75%14.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)7.64%7.82%
Return on Equity-0.66%12.39%
Return on Assets-0.82%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.031.98

Growth

Metric301259601919
Revenue Growth (YoY)28.60%-12.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-64.60%

Dividends

Metric301259601919
Dividend Yield6.70%
Dividend / Share1.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric301259601919
Sortino (Composite)5.36-0.69
Sharpe (Composite)2.31-0.76
Calmar (Composite)0.66-2.67
Hurst Exponent0.62300.6273
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,776

Ownership

Metric301259601919
% Insiders55.89%6106.30%
% Institutions0.02%829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.