Home 300274 vs 600170 300274 vs 600170: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Shanghai Construction Group Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 11.4× the market cap of Shanghai Construction Group Co Ltd. 300274 trades at a lower P/E than 600170. 300274 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 300274 600170 Current Price CN¥132.75 CN¥2.73 Daily Change -0.86% -0.36% 1-Year Return 136.76% 3.02% 52-Week High CN¥205.40 CN¥3.88 52-Week Low CN¥56.24 CN¥2.36 50-Day MA CN¥150.76 CN¥2.85 200-Day MA CN¥145.43 CN¥2.78 Beta 0.47 0.42
Size & Revenue Metric 300274 600170 Market Cap $274.35B $24.17B Enterprise Value $250.14B $1.13B Revenue (TTM) $89.18B $206.00B Shares Outstanding 2.07B 8.89B Float 1.36B 8.51B Employees 19,006 48,821
Valuation Metric 300274 600170 Trailing P/E 20.26 34.00 Forward P/E 20.79 8.03 PEG Ratio 5.78 — Price / Sales 3.08 0.12 Price / Book 5.96 0.48 EV / EBITDA 14.08 0.14
Profitability Metric 300274 600170 Profit Margin 15.09% 0.60% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.85% 4.29% Return on Equity 30.08% 2.00% Return on Assets 8.44% 0.87% Diluted EPS (TTM) 6.53 0.08
Growth Metric 300274 600170 Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.40% -44.40% Earnings Growth (YoY) -52.70% -4.60%
Dividends Metric 300274 600170 Dividend Yield 1.22% 0.00% Dividend / Share 1.64 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300274 600170 Sortino (Composite) 0.62 -0.54 Sharpe (Composite) 0.22 -0.37 Calmar (Composite) -0.48 -0.55 Hurst Exponent 0.6306 0.5779 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #6,649 #11,078
Ownership Metric 300274 600170 % Insiders 3224.10% 4643.60% % Institutions 1824.70% 350.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.