Home 300274 vs 300948 300274 vs 300948: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. Ltd. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 91.7× the market cap of Qingdao Greensum Ecology Co. Ltd.. 300274 pays a dividend; 300948 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 300274 300948 Current Price CN¥132.75 CN¥19.30 Daily Change -0.86% 1.53% 1-Year Return 136.76% 114.92% 52-Week High CN¥205.40 CN¥26.85 52-Week Low CN¥56.24 CN¥9.00 50-Day MA CN¥150.76 — 200-Day MA CN¥145.43 — Beta 0.47 1.01
Size & Revenue Metric 300274 300948 Market Cap $274.35B $2.99B Enterprise Value $250.14B $2.73B Revenue (TTM) $89.18B $108.82M Shares Outstanding 2.07B 160.79M Float 1.36B 91.42M Employees 19,006 —
Valuation Metric 300274 300948 Trailing P/E 20.26 — Forward P/E 20.79 — PEG Ratio 5.78 — Price / Sales 3.08 27.48 Price / Book 5.96 3.22 EV / EBITDA 14.08 -49.62
Profitability Metric 300274 300948 Profit Margin 15.09% -65.61% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.85% -2.77% Return on Equity 30.08% -8.52% Return on Assets 8.44% -2.31% Diluted EPS (TTM) 6.53 -0.51
Growth Metric 300274 300948 Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.40% 61.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -52.70% —
Dividends Metric 300274 300948 Dividend Yield 1.22% — Dividend / Share 1.64 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300274 300948 Sortino (Composite) 0.62 3.33 Sharpe (Composite) 0.22 1.26 Calmar (Composite) -0.48 0.27 Hurst Exponent 0.6306 0.5562 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 — Magic Formula Rank #6,649 —
Ownership Metric 300274 300948 % Insiders 3224.10% 47.87% % Institutions 1824.70% 5.55%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.