300274 vs 300851: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Beijing Jiaoda Signal Technology
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
300274•SHE
CN¥132.75
-0.86%
30
300851•SHE
CN¥29.05
-0.68%
Quick Summary
Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 108.8× the market cap of Beijing Jiaoda Signal Technology. 300274 trades at a lower P/E than 300851. 300851 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥132.75 | CN¥29.05 |
| Daily Change | -0.86% | -0.68% |
| 1-Year Return | 136.76% | 4.68% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥205.40 | CN¥32.35 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥56.24 | CN¥25.66 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥150.76 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥145.43 | — |
| Beta | 0.47 | 0.53 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $274.35B | $2.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $250.14B | $2.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89.18B | $344.33M |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.07B | 86.93M |
| Float | 1.36B | 32.42M |
| Employees | 19,006 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 20.26 | 48.33 |
| Forward P/E | 20.79 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 5.78 | — |
| Price / Sales | 3.08 | 7.32 |
| Price / Book | 5.96 | 1.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.08 | 71.77 |
Profitability
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 15.09% | 15.15% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.85% | 4.95% |
| Return on Equity | 30.08% | 4.07% |
| Return on Assets | 8.44% | 0.84% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 6.53 | 0.60 |
Growth
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -18.40% | 64.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -52.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 148.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 1.64 | 0.43 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.62 | 1.95 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.22 | 0.69 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.48 | 1.01 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6306 | 0.6438 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 9/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #6,649 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 300274 | 300851 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3224.10% | 68.63% |
| % Institutions | 1824.70% | 0.52% |
Compare 300274 to peers
Compare 300851 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.