Home 300257 vs 300274 300257 vs 300274: Zhejiang Kaishan Compressor vs Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 9.3× the market cap of Zhejiang Kaishan Compressor. 300274 trades at a lower P/E than 300257. 300274 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 300257 300274 Current Price CN¥29.38 CN¥132.75 Daily Change -4.80% -0.86% 1-Year Return 257.86% 136.76% 52-Week High CN¥34.57 CN¥205.40 52-Week Low CN¥8.30 CN¥56.24 50-Day MA CN¥26.29 CN¥150.76 200-Day MA CN¥17.75 CN¥145.43 Beta 0.68 0.47
Size & Revenue Metric 300257 300274 Market Cap $29.49B $274.35B Enterprise Value $35.96B $250.14B Revenue (TTM) $4.57B $89.18B Shares Outstanding 993.64M 2.07B Float 381.10M 1.36B Employees 3,669 19,006
Valuation Metric 300257 300274 Trailing P/E 74.20 20.26 Forward P/E 38.17 20.79 PEG Ratio — 5.78 Price / Sales 6.46 3.08 Price / Book 4.64 5.96 EV / EBITDA 42.08 14.08
Profitability Metric 300257 300274 Profit Margin 8.85% 15.09% Operating Margin (TTM) 19.65% 3.85% Return on Equity 6.30% 30.08% Return on Assets 2.75% 8.44% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.40 6.53
Growth Metric 300257 300274 Revenue Growth (YoY) 10.50% -18.40% Earnings Growth (YoY) 166.00% -52.70%
Dividends Metric 300257 300274 Dividend Yield 0.32% 1.22% Dividend / Share 0.10 1.64
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300257 300274 Sortino (Composite) 8.93 0.62 Sharpe (Composite) 3.24 0.21 Calmar (Composite) 12.19 -0.46 Hurst Exponent 0.6684 0.6306 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 9/9 Magic Formula Rank #25,174 #6,655
Ownership Metric 300257 300274 % Insiders 6680.60% 3224.10% % Institutions 329.70% 1824.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.