1925 vs 600895: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
CN¥37.04
+1.56%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 57.6× the market cap of Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd. 600895 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | CN¥37.04 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 1.56% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | 45.77% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | CN¥54.95 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | CN¥24.08 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥37.85 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥39.56 |
| Beta | — | 0.89 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $56.68B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $79.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $4.18B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.55B |
| Float | — | 790.75M |
| Employees | — | 190 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 59.03 |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.75 |
| Price / Sales | — | 13.55 |
| Price / Book | — | 3.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 33.98 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 23.58% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 37.90% |
| Return on Equity | — | 5.12% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.34% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.62 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 624.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -16.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.55% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.20 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 0.55 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 0.23 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | 4.67 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.6856 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #25,249 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5170.60% |
| % Institutions | — | 343.00% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 600895 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.