1925 vs 600649: DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. vs Shanghai SMI Holding Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
1925•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥4,852.00
-1.36%
60
600649•SHG
CN¥4.42
+0.68%
Quick Summary
DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. is 294.9× the market cap of Shanghai SMI Holding Co Ltd. 600649 pays a dividend; 1925 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥4,852.00 | CN¥4.42 |
| Daily Change | -1.36% | 0.68% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.80% | -9.05% |
| 52-Week High | ¥5,710.00 | CN¥5.64 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,763.31 | CN¥4.18 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥4.81 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥4.69 |
| Beta | — | 0.86 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26T | $11.07B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $44.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $14.46B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 2.50B |
| Float | — | 1.17B |
| Employees | — | 491 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 36.83 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.77 |
| Price / Book | — | 0.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 24.02 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 2.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 6.15% |
| Return on Equity | — | 1.12% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.98% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.12 |
Growth
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -42.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -99.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.91% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.59 | 1.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.32 | 0.56 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -4.41 | -0.90 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5586 | 0.5337 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #23,606 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1925 | 600649 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5332.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 530.70% |
Compare 1925 to peers
Compare 600649 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.