1918 vs CRBJF: Sunac China Holdings Limited vs China Resources Land Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
19
1918•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.09
+2.83%
CR
CRBJF•United States
$3.80
+0.00%
Quick Summary
China Resources Land Ltd is 1.6× the market cap of Sunac China Holdings Limited. 1918 trades at a lower P/E than CRBJF. CRBJF pays a dividend; 1918 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$1.09 | $3.80 |
| Daily Change | 2.83% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -31.01% | — |
| 52-Week High | HK$1.87 | $3.98 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$0.99 | $3.80 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$1.15 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$1.38 | — |
| Beta | 0.29 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.24B | $28.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $226.46B | $374.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.12B | $281.44B |
| Shares Outstanding | 16.12B | 7.13B |
| Float | 9.08B | 2.89B |
| Employees | 31,365 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 7.37 |
| Forward P/E | 1.14 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.43 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.38 | 0.10 |
| Price / Book | 0.43 | 0.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 81.88 | 8.09 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -27.33% | 9.03% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -12.93% | 14.59% |
| Return on Equity | -26.88% | 8.04% |
| Return on Assets | -0.72% | 2.56% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -2.48 | 0.54 |
Growth
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -36.80% | -6.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 8.40% | -11.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 462.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.18 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.04 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.64 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.51 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4675 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1918 | CRBJF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2593.40% | 59.55% |
| % Institutions | 1063.20% | 17.75% |
Compare 1918 to peers
Compare CRBJF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.