1802 vs 601868: OBAYASHI CORPORATION vs China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
60
601868•SHG
CN¥2.91
+1.04%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 20.3× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd. 601868 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,685.00 | CN¥2.91 |
| Daily Change | -2.15% | 1.04% |
| 1-Year Return | 76.54% | 28.19% |
| 52-Week High | ¥4,416.00 | CN¥3.74 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,071.64 | CN¥2.20 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥2.83 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥2.54 |
| Beta | — | 0.54 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.46T | $120.90B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $314.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $452.93B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 32.43B |
| Float | — | 19.53B |
| Employees | — | 116,055 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 15.26 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.27 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 13.32 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 1.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 5.42% |
| Return on Equity | — | 4.70% |
| Return on Assets | — | 1.37% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.19 |
Growth
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -8.60% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -47.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 1.08% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.03 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.75 | 1.82 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.61 | 0.87 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.72 | 6.12 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5744 | 0.5938 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #18,575 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1802 | 601868 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 5310.50% |
| % Institutions | — | 1099.30% |
Compare 1802 to peers
Compare 601868 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.