1618 vs SQU: Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd vs Vinci S. A.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
16
1618•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.59
-1.24%
SQ
SQU•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Quick Summary
Vinci S. A. is 1.4× the market cap of Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd. 1618 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. SQU offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$1.59 | €137.55 |
| Daily Change | -1.24% | 2.27% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.66% | 14.86% |
| 52-Week High | HK$3.05 | €142.20 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$1.46 | €113.20 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$1.79 | €133.07 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$2.04 | €123.28 |
| Beta | 1.09 | 0.79 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56.15B | $76.21B |
| Enterprise Value | $36.73B | $95.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $434.76B | $75.70B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.87B | 553.21M |
| Float | 9.27B | 477.50M |
| Employees | 89,982 | 292,101 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 15.90 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 14.99 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Price / Sales | 0.13 | 1.01 |
| Price / Book | 0.19 | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.42 | 6.97 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.30% | 6.48% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -3.24% | 13.14% |
| Return on Equity | 4.22% | 15.43% |
| Return on Assets | 0.96% | 4.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.07 | 8.65 |
Growth
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -13.70% | 5.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -59.10% | 6.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.72% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 5.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.25 | 6.26 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.07 | 2.57 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -3.84 | 2.43 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5643 | 0.5565 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,993 | #9,038 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1618 | SQU |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 1210.50% |
| % Institutions | 757.30% | 5061.00% |
Compare 1618 to peers
Compare SQU to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.