1618 vs 1919: Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.
16
1618•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.59
-1.24%
1919•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$14.70
-1.54%
Quick Summary
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H is 4.6× the market cap of Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd. 1618 trades at a lower P/E than 1919. 1919 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$1.59 | HK$14.70 |
| Daily Change | -1.24% | -1.54% |
| 1-Year Return | 9.66% | 30.55% |
| 52-Week High | HK$3.05 | HK$16.29 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$1.46 | HK$11.16 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$1.79 | HK$15.01 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$2.04 | HK$14.02 |
| Beta | 1.09 | 0.74 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56.15B | $259.60B |
| Enterprise Value | $36.73B | $174.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $434.76B | $219.50B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.87B | 2.75B |
| Float | 9.27B | 7.15B |
| Employees | 89,982 | 32,768 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 6.70 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 6.74 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 3.66 |
| Price / Sales | 0.13 | 1.18 |
| Price / Book | 0.19 | 0.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 2.42 | 3.39 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.30% | 14.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -3.24% | 7.82% |
| Return on Equity | 4.22% | 12.39% |
| Return on Assets | 0.96% | 4.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.07 | 1.71 |
Growth
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -13.70% | -12.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -59.10% | -64.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 6.52% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.25 | 1.31 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.07 | 0.46 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -3.84 | 0.18 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5643 | 0.6722 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #9,993 | #9,241 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1618 | 1919 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 1378.60% |
| % Institutions | 757.30% | 2915.00% |
Compare 1618 to peers
Compare 1919 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.