Home 1618 vs HOCFF 1618 vs HOCFF: Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd vs HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
16
1618 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd is 1.7× the market cap of HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft. 1618 trades at a lower P/E than HOCFF. HOCFF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1618 HOCFF Current Price HK$1.59 $528.50 Daily Change -1.24% -4.51% 1-Year Return 9.66% 182.62% 52-Week High HK$3.05 $573.65 52-Week Low HK$1.46 $178.00 50-Day MA HK$1.79 — 200-Day MA HK$2.04 — Beta 1.09 0.69
Size & Revenue Metric 1618 HOCFF Market Cap $56.15B $33.61B Enterprise Value $36.73B $34.66B Revenue (TTM) $434.76B $38.24B Shares Outstanding 2.87B 75.24M Float 9.27B 18.28M Employees 89,982 —
Valuation Metric 1618 HOCFF Trailing P/E 0.00 32.06 Forward P/E 0.00 — PEG Ratio 0.00 — Price / Sales 0.13 0.88 Price / Book 0.19 22.81 EV / EBITDA 2.42 22.85
Profitability Metric 1618 HOCFF Profit Margin 0.30% 2.36% Operating Margin (TTM) -3.24% 1.17% Return on Equity 4.22% 78.87% Return on Assets 0.96% 2.73% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.07 13.84
Growth Metric 1618 HOCFF Revenue Growth (YoY) -13.70% 4.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) -59.10% 25.40%
Dividends Metric 1618 HOCFF Dividend Yield 0.00% 175.00% Dividend / Share 0.00 7.77
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1618 HOCFF Sortino (Composite) -1.25 5.65 Sharpe (Composite) -1.07 3.03 Calmar (Composite) -3.84 12.54 Hurst Exponent 0.5643 0.4787 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 — Magic Formula Rank #9,993 —
Ownership Metric 1618 HOCFF % Insiders 0.00% 77.53% % Institutions 757.30% 6.91%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.