1528 vs CRMLY: Red Star Macalline Grp Corp vs China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
15
1528•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.30
-0.76%
CR
CRMLY•United States
$10.52
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Red Star Macalline Grp Corp and China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR are similar in size. 1528 trades at a lower P/E than CRMLY.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$1.30 | $10.52 |
| Daily Change | -0.76% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -4.41% | — |
| 52-Week High | HK$1.78 | $10.52 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$1.16 | $9.26 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$1.32 | $10.36 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$1.39 | $9.98 |
| Beta | 1.10 | 0.80 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.16B | $12.00B |
| Enterprise Value | $31.77B | $11.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.29B | $17.57B |
| Shares Outstanding | 741.29M | 1.14B |
| Float | 1.59B | 599.41M |
| Employees | 11,553 | 39,213 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 21.91 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | 18.52 |
| Price / Sales | 1.77 | 0.68 |
| Price / Book | 0.11 | 5.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.52 | 15.02 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.00% | 21.46% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -65.72% | 29.76% |
| Return on Equity | -69.14% | 23.92% |
| Return on Assets | 0.38% | 9.79% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -5.93 | 0.48 |
Growth
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -23.00% | 6.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -98.80% | 7.40% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.06 | 1.78 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.09 | 0.68 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 1.81 | 2.64 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5203 | 0.5271 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #23,774 | #2,813 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1528 | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 1925.00% | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | 1280.50% | 0.00% |
Compare 1528 to peers
Compare CRMLY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.