Home 1186 vs SQU 1186 vs SQU: China Railway Construction-H vs Vinci S. A. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
11
1186 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Railway Construction-H is 1.5× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 1186 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. 1186 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1186 SQU Current Price HK$5.46 €137.55 Daily Change -0.36% 2.27% 1-Year Return 10.75% 14.86% 52-Week High HK$5.98 €142.20 52-Week Low HK$4.92 €113.20 50-Day MA HK$5.41 €133.07 200-Day MA HK$5.51 €123.28 Beta 0.33 0.79
Size & Revenue Metric 1186 SQU Market Cap $111.92B $76.21B Enterprise Value $613.18B $95.14B Revenue (TTM) $1.03T $75.70B Shares Outstanding 2.08B 553.21M Float 6.62B 477.50M Employees 250,306 292,101
Valuation Metric 1186 SQU Trailing P/E 4.07 15.90 Forward P/E 2.30 14.99 PEG Ratio 1.35 2.78 Price / Sales 0.11 1.01 Price / Book 0.19 2.47 EV / EBITDA 7.92 6.97
Profitability Metric 1186 SQU Profit Margin 1.78% 6.48% Operating Margin (TTM) 2.70% 13.14% Return on Equity 5.11% 15.43% Return on Assets 1.19% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.56 8.65
Growth Metric 1186 SQU Revenue Growth (YoY) -2.50% 5.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -71.10% 6.80%
Dividends Metric 1186 SQU Dividend Yield 5.45% 3.72% Dividend / Share 0.30 5.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1186 SQU Sortino (Composite) 1.30 4.97 Sharpe (Composite) 0.82 2.18 Calmar (Composite) 4.71 10.11 Hurst Exponent 0.4737 0.5565 Piotroski F-Score 2/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #15,372 #9,098
Ownership Metric 1186 SQU % Insiders 0.00% 1210.50% % Institutions 350.70% 5061.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.