Home 1186 vs 1919 1186 vs 1919: China Railway Construction-H vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.
11
1186 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
1919 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H is 2.3× the market cap of China Railway Construction-H. 1186 trades at a lower P/E than 1919. 1919 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1186 1919 Current Price HK$5.46 HK$14.70 Daily Change -0.36% -1.54% 1-Year Return 10.75% 30.55% 52-Week High HK$5.98 HK$16.29 52-Week Low HK$4.92 HK$11.16 50-Day MA HK$5.41 HK$15.01 200-Day MA HK$5.51 HK$14.02 Beta 0.33 0.74
Size & Revenue Metric 1186 1919 Market Cap $111.92B $259.60B Enterprise Value $613.18B $174.78B Revenue (TTM) $1.03T $219.50B Shares Outstanding 2.08B 2.75B Float 6.62B 7.15B Employees 250,306 32,768
Valuation Metric 1186 1919 Trailing P/E 4.07 6.70 Forward P/E 2.30 6.74 PEG Ratio 1.35 3.66 Price / Sales 0.11 1.18 Price / Book 0.19 0.88 EV / EBITDA 7.92 3.39
Profitability Metric 1186 1919 Profit Margin 1.78% 14.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 2.70% 7.82% Return on Equity 5.11% 12.39% Return on Assets 1.19% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.56 1.71
Growth Metric 1186 1919 Revenue Growth (YoY) -2.50% -12.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -71.10% -64.60%
Dividends Metric 1186 1919 Dividend Yield 5.45% 6.52% Dividend / Share 0.30 1.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1186 1919 Sortino (Composite) 0.99 1.31 Sharpe (Composite) 0.64 0.46 Calmar (Composite) 3.27 0.18 Hurst Exponent 0.4737 0.6722 Piotroski F-Score 2/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #15,367 #9,241
Ownership Metric 1186 1919 % Insiders 0.00% 1378.60% % Institutions 350.70% 2915.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.