1186 vs 1802: China Railway Construction-H vs OBAYASHI CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
11
1186•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$5.46
-0.36%
1802•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,685.00
-2.15%
Quick Summary
OBAYASHI CORPORATION is 22.0× the market cap of China Railway Construction-H. 1186 pays a dividend; 1802 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$5.46 | ¥3,685.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.36% | -2.15% |
| 1-Year Return | 10.75% | 76.54% |
| 52-Week High | HK$5.98 | ¥4,416.00 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$4.92 | ¥2,071.64 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$5.41 | — |
| 200-Day MA | HK$5.51 | — |
| Beta | 0.33 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $111.92B | $2.46T |
| Enterprise Value | $613.18B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.03T | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.08B | — |
| Float | 6.62B | — |
| Employees | 250,306 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 4.07 | — |
| Forward P/E | 2.30 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 1.35 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.11 | — |
| Price / Book | 0.19 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.92 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 1.78% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 2.70% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.11% | — |
| Return on Assets | 1.19% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.56 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -2.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -71.10% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.45% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.30 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.99 | 2.75 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.64 | 1.61 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 3.27 | 1.72 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4737 | 0.5744 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,367 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1186 | 1802 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 350.70% | — |
Compare 1186 to peers
Compare 1802 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.