Sign up for free insights newsletter

0598 vs 601598: Sinotrans Ltd vs Sinotrans Ltd Class A

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

05
0598Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$5.12
+1.59%
Hong Kong
$44.77B
60
CN¥6.06
-0.33%
China
$43.47B

Quick Summary

Sinotrans Ltd and Sinotrans Ltd Class A are similar in size. 0598 trades at a lower P/E than 601598. 0598 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric0598601598
Current PriceHK$5.12CN¥6.06
Daily Change1.59%-0.33%
1-Year Return50.59%24.69%
52-Week HighHK$5.47CN¥7.80
52-Week LowHK$3.33CN¥4.69
50-Day MAHK$5.09CN¥5.96
200-Day MAHK$4.94CN¥6.03
Beta1.201.20

Size & Revenue

Metric0598601598
Market Cap$44.77B$43.47B
Enterprise Value$33.11B$41.28B
Revenue (TTM)$96.81B$96.81B
Shares Outstanding2.02B5.16B
Float2.76B2.76B
Employees31,95331,953

Valuation

Metric0598601598
Trailing P/E8.1011.22
Forward P/E5.220.00
PEG Ratio0.45
Price / Sales0.460.45
Price / Book0.781.10
EV / EBITDA5.267.52

Profitability

Metric0598601598
Profit Margin4.15%4.15%
Operating Margin (TTM)-0.73%-0.73%
Return on Equity9.95%9.95%
Return on Assets1.56%1.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.600.54

Growth

Metric0598601598
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.20%10.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)29.80%29.80%

Dividends

Metric0598601598
Dividend Yield6.01%4.93%
Dividend / Share0.300.30

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric0598601598
Sortino (Composite)1.250.71
Sharpe (Composite)1.800.39
Calmar (Composite)1.83-0.05
Hurst Exponent0.53770.5267
Piotroski F-Score6/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#26,107#9,411

Ownership

Metric0598601598
% Insiders2354.80%8071.90%
% Institutions2765.80%658.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.