Home 02826K vs 601868 02826K vs 601868: Samsung C and T 1P Pref vs China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Samsung C and T 1P Pref is 400.0× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd. 02826K trades at a lower P/E than 601868. 02826K offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 02826K 601868 Current Price ₩192,000.00 CN¥2.91 Daily Change 0.00% 1.04% 1-Year Return 121.97% 28.19% 52-Week High ₩219,000.00 CN¥3.74 52-Week Low ₩86,500.00 CN¥2.20 50-Day MA ₩186,416.00 CN¥2.83 200-Day MA ₩149,836.50 CN¥2.54 Beta 1.00 0.54
Size & Revenue Metric 02826K 601868 Market Cap $48.36T $120.90B Enterprise Value $48.58T $314.63B Revenue (TTM) $40.74T $452.93B Shares Outstanding 1.47M 32.43B Float 87.83M 19.53B Employees 7,884 116,055
Valuation Metric 02826K 601868 Trailing P/E 0.00 15.26 Forward P/E 0.00 0.00 Price / Sales 1.19 0.27 Price / Book 0.63 1.01 EV / EBITDA 8.90 13.32
Profitability Metric 02826K 601868 Profit Margin 5.99% 1.29% Operating Margin (TTM) 7.49% 5.42% Return on Equity 8.25% 4.70% Return on Assets 2.77% 1.37% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.00 0.19
Growth Metric 02826K 601868 Revenue Growth (YoY) 8.40% -8.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) 68.00% -47.60%
Dividends Metric 02826K 601868 Dividend Yield 1.49% 1.08% Dividend / Share 2850.00 0.03
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 02826K 601868 Sortino (Composite) 2.78 1.82 Sharpe (Composite) 6.26 0.87 Calmar (Composite) 3.77 6.12 Hurst Exponent 0.5803 0.5938 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #16,854 #18,575
Ownership Metric 02826K 601868 % Insiders 0.00% 5310.50% % Institutions 834.80% 1099.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.