Home 002808 vs 601816 002808 vs 601816: Suzhou Goldengreen Technologies Ltd vs Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd is 193.0× the market cap of Suzhou Goldengreen Technologies Ltd. 601816 pays a dividend; 002808 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 002808 601816 Current Price CN¥4.39 CN¥4.93 Daily Change -2.88% 0.00% 1-Year Return 45.36% -17.42% 52-Week High CN¥6.42 CN¥6.02 52-Week Low CN¥2.93 CN¥4.84 50-Day MA — CN¥5.00 200-Day MA — CN¥5.17 Beta 1.00 0.22
Size & Revenue Metric 002808 601816 Market Cap $1.25B $240.71B Enterprise Value $1.30B $278.84B Revenue (TTM) $228.39M $42.61B Shares Outstanding 268.80M 48.93B Float 146.39M 14.08B Employees — 86
Valuation Metric 002808 601816 Trailing P/E — 18.22 Forward P/E — 0.00 Price / Sales 5.46 5.65 Price / Book 4.78 1.18 EV / EBITDA -43.16 14.55
Profitability Metric 002808 601816 Profit Margin -23.95% 30.64% Operating Margin (TTM) 2.73% 48.10% Return on Equity -16.98% 5.80% Return on Assets -5.24% 4.17% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.20 0.27
Growth Metric 002808 601816 Revenue Growth (YoY) 107.20% 2.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) — 9.40%
Dividends Metric 002808 601816 Dividend Yield — 3.18% Dividend / Share — 0.16
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002808 601816 Sortino (Composite) -0.00 -0.79 Sharpe (Composite) -0.03 -0.60 Calmar (Composite) -0.40 -0.57 Hurst Exponent 0.7366 0.4423 Piotroski F-Score — 9/9 Magic Formula Rank — #15,979
Ownership Metric 002808 601816 % Insiders 54.42% 6497.20% % Institutions 0.00% 2138.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.