002800 vs TGHN: Xinjiang Tianshun Supply Chain Co Ltd vs Logwin AG
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
00
002800•SHE
CN¥17.49
+3.43%
TG
TGHN•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€288.00
+1.41%
Quick Summary
Xinjiang Tianshun Supply Chain Co Ltd is 3.4× the market cap of Logwin AG. 002800 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥17.49 | €288.00 |
| Daily Change | 3.43% | 1.41% |
| 1-Year Return | 53.56% | 17.07% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥24.35 | €300.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥11.43 | €236.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | €284.92 |
| 200-Day MA | — | €261.88 |
| Beta | 0.39 | 0.12 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.83B | $829.21M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.40B | $504.39M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $1.36B |
| Shares Outstanding | 152.25M | 2.88M |
| Float | 74.22M | 370,959 |
| Employees | — | 3,690 |
Valuation
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 13.62 |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.28 |
| Price / Sales | 2.49 | 0.61 |
| Price / Book | 5.76 | 2.10 |
| EV / EBITDA | 713.97 | 4.16 |
Profitability
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -2.10% | 4.47% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 2.95% | 6.04% |
| Return on Equity | -5.12% | 15.95% |
| Return on Assets | -0.10% | 6.57% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.16 | 21.14 |
Growth
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -31.60% | -16.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -6.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 14.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.03 | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.96 | 1.09 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.49 | 0.70 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.45 | 1.10 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6121 | 0.5569 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #4,879 |
Ownership
| Metric | 002800 | TGHN |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 55.92% | 8729.00% |
| % Institutions | 0.68% | 33.40% |
Compare 002800 to peers
Compare TGHN to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.