Sign up for free insights newsletter

002800 vs 601919: Xinjiang Tianshun Supply Chain Co Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥17.49
+3.43%
China
$2.83B
CN¥14.72
-1.34%
China
$225.40B

Quick Summary

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 79.5× the market cap of Xinjiang Tianshun Supply Chain Co Ltd. 002800 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric002800601919
Current PriceCN¥17.49CN¥14.72
Daily Change3.43%-1.34%
1-Year Return53.56%3.52%
52-Week HighCN¥24.35CN¥16.97
52-Week LowCN¥11.43CN¥14.15
50-Day MACN¥15.17
200-Day MACN¥15.09
Beta0.390.74

Size & Revenue

Metric002800601919
Market Cap$2.83B$225.40B
Enterprise Value$3.40B$148.41B
Revenue (TTM)$1.14B$219.50B
Shares Outstanding152.25M12.56B
Float74.22M7.15B
Employees32,768

Valuation

Metric002800601919
Trailing P/E7.43
Forward P/E8.52
PEG Ratio0.26
Price / Sales2.491.03
Price / Book5.760.98
EV / EBITDA713.973.30

Profitability

Metric002800601919
Profit Margin-2.10%14.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)2.95%7.82%
Return on Equity-5.12%12.39%
Return on Assets-0.10%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.161.98

Growth

Metric002800601919
Revenue Growth (YoY)-31.60%-12.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-64.60%

Dividends

Metric002800601919
Dividend Yield14.00%6.70%
Dividend / Share0.031.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002800601919
Sortino (Composite)3.96-0.63
Sharpe (Composite)1.49-0.69
Calmar (Composite)0.45-2.79
Hurst Exponent0.61210.6273
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,781

Ownership

Metric002800601919
% Insiders55.92%6106.30%
% Institutions0.68%829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.