Home 002202 vs FLS 002202 vs FLS: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs FLSmidth & Co. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A is 3.8× the market cap of FLSmidth & Co.. 002202 trades at a lower P/E than FLS. 002202 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 002202 FLS Current Price CN¥25.39 DKK 542.00 Daily Change 1.60% 3.83% 1-Year Return 210.77% 84.73% 52-Week High CN¥35.13 DKK 611.00 52-Week Low CN¥8.19 DKK 291.20 50-Day MA CN¥26.71 DKK 533.07 200-Day MA CN¥18.71 DKK 464.02 Beta 0.81 1.37
Size & Revenue Metric 002202 FLS Market Cap $107.24B $28.57B Enterprise Value $121.64B $30.92B Revenue (TTM) $73.02B $14.61B Shares Outstanding 3.45B 54.21M Float 2.88B 45.87M Employees 11,890 5,296
Valuation Metric 002202 FLS Trailing P/E 40.30 42.92 Forward P/E 22.94 20.79 PEG Ratio 10.64 2.29 Price / Sales 1.47 1.96 Price / Book 2.43 3.04 EV / EBITDA 13.30 11.87
Profitability Metric 002202 FLS Profit Margin 3.80% 0.00% Operating Margin (TTM) 4.74% 12.45% Return on Equity 6.91% 6.71% Return on Assets 1.46% 4.72% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.63 12.28
Growth Metric 002202 FLS Revenue Growth (YoY) 19.30% -3.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) 161.80% 38.00%
Dividends Metric 002202 FLS Dividend Yield 0.80% 0.75% Dividend / Share 0.20 4.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002202 FLS Sortino (Composite) 3.27 11.18 Sharpe (Composite) 3.80 3.69 Calmar (Composite) 3.13 2.06 Hurst Exponent 0.6516 0.7523 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,575 #11,971
Ownership Metric 002202 FLS % Insiders 2877.80% 1529.70% % Institutions 1403.40% 3521.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.