Sign up for free insights newsletter

002202 vs 601919: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥14.72
-1.34%
China
$225.40B

Quick Summary

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 2.1× the market cap of Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A. 601919 trades at a lower P/E than 002202. 601919 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric002202601919
Current PriceCN¥25.39CN¥14.72
Daily Change1.60%-1.34%
1-Year Return210.77%3.52%
52-Week HighCN¥35.13CN¥16.97
52-Week LowCN¥8.19CN¥14.15
50-Day MACN¥26.71CN¥15.17
200-Day MACN¥18.71CN¥15.09
Beta0.810.74

Size & Revenue

Metric002202601919
Market Cap$107.24B$225.40B
Enterprise Value$121.64B$148.41B
Revenue (TTM)$73.02B$219.50B
Shares Outstanding3.45B12.56B
Float2.88B7.15B
Employees11,89032,768

Valuation

Metric002202601919
Trailing P/E40.307.43
Forward P/E22.948.52
PEG Ratio10.640.26
Price / Sales1.471.03
Price / Book2.430.98
EV / EBITDA13.303.30

Profitability

Metric002202601919
Profit Margin3.80%14.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)4.74%7.82%
Return on Equity6.91%12.39%
Return on Assets1.46%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.631.98

Growth

Metric002202601919
Revenue Growth (YoY)19.30%-12.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)161.80%-64.60%

Dividends

Metric002202601919
Dividend Yield0.80%6.70%
Dividend / Share0.201.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002202601919
Sortino (Composite)3.27-0.69
Sharpe (Composite)3.80-0.76
Calmar (Composite)3.13-2.67
Hurst Exponent0.65160.6273
Piotroski F-Score6/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,575#8,776

Ownership

Metric002202601919
% Insiders2877.80%6106.30%
% Institutions1403.40%829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.