Home 002202 vs FANUF 002202 vs FANUF: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs Fanuc Corporation Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A is 2.9× the market cap of Fanuc Corporation. FANUF trades at a lower P/E than 002202. FANUF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 002202 FANUF Current Price CN¥25.39 $40.87 Daily Change 1.60% 7.86% 1-Year Return 210.77% 71.36% 52-Week High CN¥35.13 $45.30 52-Week Low CN¥8.19 $23.63 50-Day MA CN¥26.71 $41.66 200-Day MA CN¥18.71 $33.10 Beta 0.81 0.59
Size & Revenue Metric 002202 FANUF Market Cap $107.24B $37.12B Enterprise Value $121.64B $31.40B Revenue (TTM) $73.02B $835.43B Shares Outstanding 3.45B 933.16M Float 2.88B 919.95M Employees 11,890 10,113
Valuation Metric 002202 FANUF Trailing P/E 40.30 37.53 Forward P/E 22.94 32.36 PEG Ratio 10.64 2.97 Price / Sales 1.47 0.04 Price / Book 2.43 3.29 EV / EBITDA 13.30 23.18
Profitability Metric 002202 FANUF Profit Margin 3.80% 19.35% Operating Margin (TTM) 4.74% 19.35% Return on Equity 6.91% 9.37% Return on Assets 1.46% 5.59% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.63 1.06
Growth Metric 002202 FANUF Revenue Growth (YoY) 19.30% 9.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) 161.80% 12.70%
Dividends Metric 002202 FANUF Dividend Yield 0.80% 1.65% Dividend / Share 0.20 101.21
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002202 FANUF Sortino (Composite) 3.27 1.50 Sharpe (Composite) 3.80 0.93 Calmar (Composite) 3.13 4.14 Hurst Exponent 0.6516 0.4554 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 8/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,575 #7,658
Ownership Metric 002202 FANUF % Insiders 2877.80% 73.10% % Institutions 1403.40% 5158.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.