Sign up for free insights newsletter

002202 vs ETN: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs Eaton Corporation PLC

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

Eaton Corporation PLC
ETNUnited States
$406.21
+3.43%
United States
$156.53B

Quick Summary

Eaton Corporation PLC is 1.5× the market cap of Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A. ETN trades at a lower P/E than 002202. ETN offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric002202ETN
Current PriceCN¥25.39$406.21
Daily Change1.60%3.43%
1-Year Return210.77%51.39%
52-Week HighCN¥35.13$406.21
52-Week LowCN¥8.19$259.47
50-Day MACN¥26.71$367.50
200-Day MACN¥18.71$358.58
Beta0.811.16

Size & Revenue

Metric002202ETN
Market Cap$107.24B$156.53B
Enterprise Value$121.64B$166.09B
Revenue (TTM)$73.02B$23.20B
Shares Outstanding3.45B387.99M
Float2.88B387.25M
Employees11,89097,303

Valuation

Metric002202ETN
Trailing P/E40.3038.60
Forward P/E22.9430.30
PEG Ratio10.642.99
Price / Sales1.475.70
Price / Book2.438.05
EV / EBITDA13.3026.88

Profitability

Metric002202ETN
Profit Margin3.80%14.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)4.74%19.97%
Return on Equity6.91%21.53%
Return on Assets1.46%8.33%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.638.06

Growth

Metric002202ETN
Revenue Growth (YoY)19.30%13.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)161.80%18.90%

Dividends

Metric002202ETN
Dividend Yield0.80%1.04%
Dividend / Share0.204.16

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002202ETN
Sortino (Composite)3.274.90
Sharpe (Composite)3.802.79
Calmar (Composite)3.1314.93
Hurst Exponent0.65160.6005
Piotroski F-Score6/97/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,575#13,500

Ownership

Metric002202ETN
% Insiders2877.80%6.50%
% Institutions1403.40%8541.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.