Home 002202 vs ATLPF 002202 vs ATLPF: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs Atlas Copco AB Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A is 1.2× the market cap of Atlas Copco AB. ATLPF trades at a lower P/E than 002202. 002202 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 002202 ATLPF Current Price CN¥25.39 $20.64 Daily Change 1.60% 4.85% 1-Year Return 210.77% 31.31% 52-Week High CN¥35.13 $22.26 52-Week Low CN¥8.19 $14.67 50-Day MA CN¥26.71 $19.49 200-Day MA CN¥18.71 $17.83 Beta 0.81 1.05
Size & Revenue Metric 002202 ATLPF Market Cap $107.24B $93.05B Enterprise Value $121.64B $92.61B Revenue (TTM) $73.02B $171.55B Shares Outstanding 3.45B 3.32B Float 2.88B 3.94B Employees 11,890 56,356
Valuation Metric 002202 ATLPF Trailing P/E 40.30 32.90 Forward P/E 22.94 27.93 PEG Ratio 10.64 3.05 Price / Sales 1.47 5.15 Price / Book 2.43 7.88 EV / EBITDA 13.30 19.53
Profitability Metric 002202 ATLPF Profit Margin 3.80% 15.69% Operating Margin (TTM) 4.74% 0.00% Return on Equity 6.91% 23.58% Return on Assets 1.46% 10.71% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.63 0.58
Growth Metric 002202 ATLPF Revenue Growth (YoY) 19.30% -7.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) 161.80% -15.00%
Dividends Metric 002202 ATLPF Dividend Yield 0.80% 0.00% Dividend / Share 0.20 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002202 ATLPF Sortino (Composite) 3.27 7.23 Sharpe (Composite) 3.80 4.54 Calmar (Composite) 3.13 1.17 Hurst Exponent 0.6516 0.5595 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #21,575 #2,545
Ownership Metric 002202 ATLPF % Insiders 2877.80% 0.20% % Institutions 1403.40% 6673.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.