Sign up for free insights newsletter

002202 vs 600406: Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A vs NARI Technology Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥26.81
-0.22%
China
$215.33B

Quick Summary

NARI Technology Co Ltd is 2.0× the market cap of Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co Ltd Class A. 600406 trades at a lower P/E than 002202. 600406 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric002202600406
Current PriceCN¥25.39CN¥26.81
Daily Change1.60%-0.22%
1-Year Return210.77%15.06%
52-Week HighCN¥35.13CN¥30.70
52-Week LowCN¥8.19CN¥21.30
50-Day MACN¥26.71CN¥27.19
200-Day MACN¥18.71CN¥24.06
Beta0.810.51

Size & Revenue

Metric002202600406
Market Cap$107.24B$215.33B
Enterprise Value$121.64B$196.32B
Revenue (TTM)$73.02B$63.43B
Shares Outstanding3.45B8.03B
Float2.88B3.30B
Employees11,89011,131

Valuation

Metric002202600406
Trailing P/E40.3026.81
Forward P/E22.9424.75
PEG Ratio10.64
Price / Sales1.473.40
Price / Book2.434.38
EV / EBITDA13.3020.53

Profitability

Metric002202600406
Profit Margin3.80%12.59%
Operating Margin (TTM)4.74%15.25%
Return on Equity6.91%16.75%
Return on Assets1.46%6.16%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.631.00

Growth

Metric002202600406
Revenue Growth (YoY)19.30%16.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)161.80%9.10%

Dividends

Metric002202600406
Dividend Yield0.80%2.17%
Dividend / Share0.200.58

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002202600406
Sortino (Composite)3.270.76
Sharpe (Composite)3.802.14
Calmar (Composite)3.130.58
Hurst Exponent0.65160.6342
Piotroski F-Score6/97/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,575#11,341

Ownership

Metric002202600406
% Insiders2877.80%6164.00%
% Institutions1403.40%1293.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.