002077 vs 1918: Jiangsu Dagang Co Ltd vs Sunac China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
00
002077•SHE
CN¥16.16
+0.25%
19
1918•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.09
+2.83%
Quick Summary
Sunac China Holdings Limited is 1.8× the market cap of Jiangsu Dagang Co Ltd. 1918 trades at a lower P/E than 002077.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥16.16 | HK$1.09 |
| Daily Change | 0.25% | 2.83% |
| 1-Year Return | 14.29% | -31.01% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥18.90 | HK$1.87 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥13.18 | HK$0.99 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥16.35 | HK$1.15 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥16.07 | HK$1.38 |
| Beta | 0.44 | 0.29 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.38B | $17.24B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.54B | $226.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $366.42M | $45.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | 580.35M | 16.12B |
| Float | 294.77M | 9.08B |
| Employees | 432 | 31,365 |
Valuation
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 202.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 38.46 | 1.14 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Price / Sales | 25.59 | 0.38 |
| Price / Book | 2.79 | 0.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 129.32 | 81.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 12.12% | -27.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 2.38% | -12.93% |
| Return on Equity | 1.43% | -26.88% |
| Return on Assets | 0.13% | -0.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.08 | -2.48 |
Growth
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.50% | -36.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 213.60% | 8.40% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.58 | -0.92 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.28 | 1.74 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.23 | -1.33 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5647 | 0.4675 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #28,510 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 002077 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5077.50% | 2593.40% |
| % Institutions | 142.00% | 1063.20% |
Compare 002077 to peers
Compare 1918 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.