Sign up for free insights newsletter

000429 vs 200429: Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd vs Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

Quick Summary

Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd and Guangdong Provincial Expressway Development Co Ltd are similar in size. 200429 trades at a lower P/E than 000429. 200429 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric000429200429
Current PriceCN¥12.70HK$8.93
Daily Change-1.17%0.00%
1-Year Return-9.29%14.49%
52-Week HighCN¥14.65HK$9.18
52-Week LowCN¥10.70HK$7.81
50-Day MACN¥12.47HK$8.92
200-Day MACN¥12.06HK$8.65
Beta-0.06-0.06

Size & Revenue

Metric000429200429
Market Cap$26.55B$26.51B
Enterprise Value$29.14B$33.49B
Revenue (TTM)$4.47B$4.47B
Shares Outstanding1.74B348.75M
Float842.43M842.43M
Employees3,0293,029

Valuation

Metric000429200429
Trailing P/E14.779.02
Forward P/E18.3211.89
PEG Ratio0.550.00
Price / Sales5.945.93
Price / Book2.421.46
EV / EBITDA6.746.74

Profitability

Metric000429200429
Profit Margin40.30%40.30%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.84%13.84%
Return on Equity18.17%18.17%
Return on Assets6.74%6.74%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.860.99

Growth

Metric000429200429
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.70%3.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)22.00%22.00%

Dividends

Metric000429200429
Dividend Yield4.70%6.76%
Dividend / Share0.600.60

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric000429200429
Sortino (Composite)1.933.77
Sharpe (Composite)1.111.80
Calmar (Composite)6.923.84
Hurst Exponent0.57830.6266
Piotroski F-Score5/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,208#8,843

Ownership

Metric000429200429
% Insiders7090.30%378.50%
% Institutions1002.30%553.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.