Home 000035 vs GFL 000035 vs GFL: China Tianying Inc vs Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
GFL • Toronto Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc is 1.1× the market cap of China Tianying Inc. 000035 trades at a lower P/E than GFL. 000035 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 000035 GFL Current Price CN¥7.10 CA$53.28 Daily Change 4.26% -0.28% 1-Year Return 63.22% -20.53% 52-Week High CN¥8.30 CA$71.13 52-Week Low CN¥4.22 CA$53.23 50-Day MA CN¥6.82 CA$58.50 200-Day MA CN¥5.70 CA$62.45 Beta 0.78 0.53
Size & Revenue Metric 000035 GFL Market Cap $16.96B $19.35B Enterprise Value $25.23B $27.26B Revenue (TTM) $5.34B $6.62B Shares Outstanding 2.39B 349.16M Float 1.58B 273.03M Employees 19,595 14,850
Valuation Metric 000035 GFL Trailing P/E 71.00 95.50 Forward P/E 12.22 42.92 PEG Ratio 0.00 — Price / Sales 3.17 2.92 Price / Book 1.49 2.64 EV / EBITDA 116.66 13.63
Profitability Metric 000035 GFL Profit Margin 4.31% 57.95% Operating Margin (TTM) 23.29% 6.37% Return on Equity 2.28% 3.28% Return on Assets 1.55% 1.23% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.10 0.56
Growth Metric 000035 GFL Revenue Growth (YoY) -15.70% 7.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) 2832.70% 22.20%
Dividends Metric 000035 GFL Dividend Yield 0.51% 0.16% Dividend / Share 0.04 0.08
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000035 GFL Sortino (Composite) 1.82 -1.27 Sharpe (Composite) 6.20 -0.99 Calmar (Composite) 2.06 -1.41 Hurst Exponent 0.5612 0.5568 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #24,984 #25,690
Ownership Metric 000035 GFL % Insiders 2877.60% 296.60% % Institutions 2382.10% 10061.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.