Home 000031 vs SNLAF 000031 vs SNLAF: Grandjoy Holdings Group Co Ltd vs Sino Land Company Limited Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Grandjoy Holdings Group Co Ltd and Sino Land Company Limited are similar in size. 000031 trades at a lower P/E than SNLAF. SNLAF pays a dividend; 000031 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 000031 SNLAF Current Price CN¥2.92 $1.34 Daily Change 0.69% 0.00% 1-Year Return 6.57% — 52-Week High CN¥3.91 $1.34 52-Week Low CN¥2.55 $1.32 50-Day MA CN¥3.24 — 200-Day MA CN¥3.17 — Beta 1.02 0.51
Size & Revenue Metric 000031 SNLAF Market Cap $12.52B $12.52B Enterprise Value $53.63B $-35.07B Revenue (TTM) $35.96B $9.51B Shares Outstanding 4.29B 9.48B Float 1.29B 3.69B Employees 6,189 —
Valuation Metric 000031 SNLAF Trailing P/E 0.00 26.40 Forward P/E 9.10 — PEG Ratio 43.65 — Price / Sales 0.35 1.32 Price / Book 1.23 0.58 EV / EBITDA 41.33 -10.71
Profitability Metric 000031 SNLAF Profit Margin -8.13% 39.23% Operating Margin (TTM) 20.40% 31.07% Return on Equity -6.32% 2.20% Return on Assets 1.22% 1.08% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.67 0.05
Growth Metric 000031 SNLAF Revenue Growth (YoY) 23.20% 34.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) -99.20% -15.80%
Dividends Metric 000031 SNLAF Dividend Yield — 563.00% Dividend / Share — 0.07
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 000031 SNLAF Sortino (Composite) -0.31 — Sharpe (Composite) -0.22 — Calmar (Composite) -1.40 — Hurst Exponent 0.6430 — Piotroski F-Score 5/9 —
Ownership Metric 000031 SNLAF % Insiders 7198.40% 60.98% % Institutions 640.70% 10.19%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.