000002 vs 000031: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Grandjoy Holdings Group Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
000002•SHE
CN¥3.96
+0.00%
00
000031•SHE
CN¥2.92
+0.69%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 3.8× the market cap of Grandjoy Holdings Group Co Ltd. 000031 trades at a lower P/E than 000002.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.96 | CN¥2.92 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| 1-Year Return | -45.83% | 6.57% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥7.18 | CN¥3.91 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.81 | CN¥2.55 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.50 | CN¥3.24 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.63 | CN¥3.17 |
| Beta | 0.85 | 1.02 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.25B | $12.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $322.91B | $53.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233.43B | $35.96B |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.72B | 4.29B |
| Float | 8.68B | 1.29B |
| Employees | 127,638 | 6,189 |
Valuation
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 9.10 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.27 | 43.65 |
| Price / Sales | 0.20 | 0.35 |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | 1.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.44 | 41.33 |
Profitability
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -37.94% | -8.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -82.99% | 20.40% |
| Return on Equity | -27.68% | -6.32% |
| Return on Assets | -0.88% | 1.22% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -7.45 | -0.67 |
Growth
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -41.60% | 23.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.70% | -99.20% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.28 | -0.31 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.23 | -0.22 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.35 | -1.40 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5951 | 0.6430 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 5/9 |
Ownership
| Metric | 000002 | 000031 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3535.40% | 7198.40% |
| % Institutions | 758.10% | 640.70% |
Compare 000002 to peers
Compare 000031 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.