000002 vs 600657: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Cinda Real Estate Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
000002•SHE
CN¥3.96
+0.00%
60
600657•SHG
CN¥3.12
+0.32%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 5.3× the market cap of Cinda Real Estate Co Ltd. 600657 trades at a lower P/E than 000002.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.96 | CN¥3.12 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.32% |
| 1-Year Return | -45.83% | -31.28% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥7.18 | CN¥4.64 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.81 | CN¥2.95 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.50 | CN¥3.27 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.63 | CN¥3.68 |
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.94 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.25B | $8.90B |
| Enterprise Value | $322.91B | $35.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233.43B | $4.58B |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.72B | 2.85B |
| Float | 8.68B | 646.58M |
| Employees | 127,638 | 2,954 |
Valuation
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 7.02 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.27 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.20 | 1.94 |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | 0.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.44 | 53.51 |
Profitability
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -37.94% | -171.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -82.99% | -168.06% |
| Return on Equity | -27.68% | -38.79% |
| Return on Assets | -0.88% | -3.63% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -7.45 | -2.76 |
Growth
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -41.60% | -58.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.70% | 183.20% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.28 | -1.09 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.23 | -0.77 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.35 | -1.66 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5951 | 0.4916 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 4/9 |
Ownership
| Metric | 000002 | 600657 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3535.40% | 7809.80% |
| % Institutions | 758.10% | 163.90% |
Compare 000002 to peers
Compare 600657 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.