HLMAF vs J36: Halma plc vs JMH USD
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
HL
HLMAF•United States
$61.71
+2.15%
J3
J36•SGX
$72.86
-1.50%
Quick Summary
Halma plc and JMH USD are similar in size. HLMAF pays a dividend; J36 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $61.71 | $72.86 |
| Daily Change | 2.15% | -1.50% |
| 1-Year Return | 80.02% | 79.30% |
| 52-Week High | $61.71 | $82.50 |
| 52-Week Low | $34.51 | $41.10 |
| 50-Day MA | $51.09 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $46.49 | — |
| Beta | 0.92 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.67B | $21.43B |
| Enterprise Value | $20.41B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.41B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 377.70M | — |
| Float | 373.11M | — |
| Employees | 9,000 | 200,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 42.69 | — |
| Forward P/E | 30.58 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.85 | — |
| Price / Sales | 8.16 | — |
| Price / Book | 7.39 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.23 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 14.39% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.50% | — |
| Return on Equity | 18.61% | — |
| Return on Assets | 9.65% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.22 | — |
Growth
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.20% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 37.00% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.24 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 13.95 | 1.41 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 7.08 | 0.84 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.82 | 3.76 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5546 | 0.5041 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,715 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | HLMAF | J36 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 108.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 5677.70% | — |
Compare HLMAF to peers
Compare J36 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.