GTWCF vs ISCN: Greentown China Holdings Limited vs Israel Canada
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
IS
ISCN•TA
₪1,850.00
+0.54%
Quick Summary
Israel Canada is 1.8× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Limited. GTWCF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $1.45 | ₪1,850.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.54% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 48.36% |
| 52-Week High | $1.45 | ₪2,270.00 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.45 | ₪1,097.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | ₪1,947.56 |
| 200-Day MA | — | ₪1,700.17 |
| Beta | 0.67 | 0.90 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.68B | $6.72B |
| Enterprise Value | $168.50B | $13.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $142.35B | $871.15M |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.54B | 341.10M |
| Float | 1.02B | 121.95M |
| Employees | — | 110 |
Valuation
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 218.78 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | 0.03 | 7.71 |
| Price / Book | 0.72 | 2.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.25 | 49.50 |
Profitability
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -0.17% | 3.31% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 8.55% | -11.18% |
| Return on Equity | 1.79% | 0.02% |
| Return on Assets | 1.16% | 0.25% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.01 | 0.09 |
Growth
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -23.30% | 87.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -89.70% | -61.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 288.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.04 | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | — | 1.24 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | — | 3.10 |
| Calmar (Composite) | — | 1.45 |
| Hurst Exponent | — | 0.5738 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 3/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #28,460 |
Ownership
| Metric | GTWCF | ISCN |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 59.96% | 4832.70% |
| % Institutions | 10.70% | 3495.20% |
Compare GTWCF to peers
Compare ISCN to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.